As developers, we work every day with Docker. And if you don't, you should! The main purpose of Docker is to insure portability between your development machine, the staging and the production environments. As long as you write and test your code inside a Docker container, you can be confident that such container, once deployed into production, will keep working as expected. You can finally use the "it works on my machine!" sentence! Another great technology we deal with every day is Docker Compose. With Compose, you can define and link together different containers to simulate a bigger architecture. A typical use case is represented by a first container which encapsulates a web-app, linked to a second container with the DB. Great, right? One thing we don't do every day though is to create new projects, the famous "initial commit". Usually, someone else already set up the project, possibly a long time ago, and configured, among other things, its Docker and Compose settings. And, most of the times, you don't have to deal with, or change, such settings.
The other day my colleague and I picked what it seemed an harmless card from
our wall, so we decided to start with some nice refactoring.
"It'll be quick mate", were our famous last words. But this is another story.
On our path to enlightenment we had to explore the scripts that run tests in
Docker (and therefore in the CI), and we came across a
wait script that
goes more or less like that:
#! /bin/sh set -e while ! nc -w 1 $DB_HOST $DB_PORT 2>/dev/null do sleep 1 done
What are you waiting for?
The codebase we were refactoring is a typical Docker Compose use case. There is
a main container which holds the source code, and a second one with the DB.
The aforementioned script is used by the CI to wait for the DB inside the
container to be up and running before running the tests. Without the
script we can be in a state where both containers are healthy, from Docker's
point of view, but the source code inside them (the DB in our case) is not yet
ready to be executed. Like the Schrödinger's cat,
our DB can be both dead and alive! Well, sort of.
Docker Compose, in its version 2.1, introduced a nice feature to overcome this problem: healthchecks! With this feature, it is possible to define a conditional dependency between two containers, and this condition is basically that the container we depend on is healthy. What does healthy mean though? Let's consider the following, simplistic, example:
version: "2.1" services: webapp: image: myapp depends_on: database: condition: service_healthy database: image: postgres:9.4 healthcheck: test: ["CMD-SHELL", "pg_isready"] interval: 5s timeout: 30s retries: 3
We have a first container,
webapp, which runs our source code, and it
depends on a second container being healthy. The definition of healthy, in this
example, is that PostgreSQL's pg_isready
0, A.K.A. the DB is up, running and accepting connections.
Thanks to Compose healthchecks we don't need all the
wait scripts (or worse)
workarounds anymore and we can leave the composition responsibility to, well,